AI-generated content has made significant strides; tools like ChatGPT can now create coherent, well-structured, and grammatically sound articles at scale. Nonetheless, despite these advancements, AI content frequently faces challenges in ranking on search engines. The problem is not solely the use of AI, but rather how the content matches (or does not match) the evolving quality standards of search engines.
-
Lack of Originality
A prevalent issue is the lack of original insight. AI models create content by analysing language patterns found in existing data. Consequently, numerous AI-generated articles reword readily accessible information instead of providing a new viewpoint. Content often struggles to differentiate itself in competitive search rankings when there is no distinctive value, like fresh data, expert insight, or an innovative approach.
-
Unnatural or Robotic Language
While AI-generated text is readable, it may still seem somewhat “off” to human readers. The phrasing can be technically accurate yet awkward, repetitive, or excessively formal. This subtle awkwardness can affect user experience, resulting in decreased time on page and increased bounce rates—factors that indirectly affect rankings. Search engines favour content that connects with real users, not merely with algorithms.
-
Keyword Misuse
AI can be programmed to incorporate specific keywords, yet it does not always achieve this with elegance. Some generated content unnaturally forces keywords or repeats them in a way that diminishes readability. This not only disrupts the flow but may also activate spam detection algorithms. Effective SEO today hinges on semantic relevance and natural language, rather than strict keyword density.
-
Factual Inaccuracies
Although AI can appear authoritative, it can also be confidently incorrect. Without real-time verification or domain knowledge, AI may generate outdated or misleading information. Even minor inaccuracies can undermine trust, damage brand reputation, and raise the chances of being flagged by Google’s quality algorithms.
-
Fluff and Low Information Density
AI frequently uses generalised statements and unnecessary wording. For example, an article that aims to be concise and insightful may become elongated to reach the desired word count by including vague summaries. Such superficial content seldom performs well, particularly in areas where users expect expert-level detail.
-
Lack of Topical Authority
Google increasingly gives preference to content from sources recognised for their topical authority. Unless integrated into a comprehensive content strategy, AI-generated content lacks characteristics such as authorship, experience, and context. It fails to enhance a brand’s E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness), which Google factors into its content quality assessments.
While AI is a potent resource, it should not be viewed as a shortcut to achieving high search rankings. As search engines improve their ability to assess quality, intent, and authority, the standards continue to heighten. To effectively leverage AI-generated content, creators need to go beyond mere automation and aim to provide genuine value. Collaboration between humans and AI, rather than reliance solely on automation, is essential for achieving lasting SEO success.
Looking to make your AI content more relatable in English, Polish, or another language?
We provide customised content humanisation services that guarantee your text adheres to quality, SEO, and user experience criteria.
Do not hesitate to contact us with any questions—we are here to assist!
Check our social media: Facebook / LinkedIn
If you want to read about previous years with MD Online, click here!
Leave a Reply